Sense

Electric vehicle (EV) stocks have emerged as a battleground investment opportunity. Pros include long-term tailwinds that support increased EV demand, sustained tax credits, heavy investment by automakers, and a focus on tackling climate change. But the cons aren't to be trifled

Bankers in London braced for hundreds of potential job losses and a hit to Britain's already-dented financial sector after the historic rescue of Credit Suisse by Swiss rival UBS.

The company continues its fight against the recent Commission position on crypto staking.

United States-based crypto exchange Coinbase decided to communicate proactively on the topic of crypto staking, which had recently gained regulators’ attention. In its petition to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the company explains why staking can’t be universally labeled as securities.

The Petition for Rulemaking was published by Coinbase on March 20. In an 18-page document, the firm focus on the securities law treatment of services related to the validation of proof-of-stake protocols. It was written in response to the SEC’s February crackdown on Kraken staking program — back then, the Commission charged an exchange with “failing to register the offer and sale of their crypto asset staking-as-a-service program,” which it qualified as securities.

In the petition, Coinbase draws on the notion that staking isn’t a monolith operation concept. While some of the existing models may fall under the definition of investment contract offerings, others clearly can’t. Particularly, it is the core staking services that don’t meet the criteria of the Howey test, the company emphasizes.

Core staking services do not involve an investment of money, as the opportunity cost of staking is not an investment — what the users give up temporarily is the alternative use of their assets, not money.

There is also no common enterprise among stakers or between stakers and service providers. Users retain full authority over their assets, with the ability to unstake them, sell, hypothecate, vote, pledge or otherwise dispose of them independent of the service provider.

According to Coinbase, core staking services also fail the “expectation of profit,” given that the rewards the users receive are just payments for services rendered. And finally, core staking services entail ministerial maintenance and not managerial efforts in the sense of traditional investing.

Coinbase cites several historical precedents that can guide SEC on the current regulatory work with crypto staking, namely the 1973’s Committee on Special Investment Advisory Services, 2000’s Regulation Fair Disclosure and 2017’s The DAO Section 21(a) Report.

Related: Coinbase pauses support for Signature Bank’s Signet

The company reminds the regulators about the significant economic consequences of their actions on the digital asset ecosystem and urges them to take a different approach to the treatment of staking services.

Right after the collision with Kraken in February, Coinbase publicly distanced its staking programs as ‘fundamentally different’ from Kraken’s, with the company’s CEO Brian Armstrong expressing his readiness to defend this position in court “if needed.” In March,

Coinbase reiterated to customers that its staking services will continue and “may actually increase” despite the SEC’s actions.